I’ll take the vote whichever way it goes. But the point I want to make is that the DAO rebuilds the system to the benefit of all coin holders. However, the DAO recovery reward is only beneficial to the pledgee, which is an increase in liquidity behavior for the market, and is unfavorable to the holder without the pledge. So there’s a clear difference between the two.
I use an analogy, if the entire governance is hacked and 800,000 Torn is stolen, should the DAO be liable for that loss? I think it’s up to the current Torn owner to decide, and the former owner is the past tense.
I can accept the results and encourage everyone to participate in the discussion
I agree with you
All of the people who voted against the proposal are those who recently purchased and staked the token.
You can see it by looking at the wallet history on Etherscan.
They are more concerned about the token price right now than the normalization of governance.
The people who are driving down the value of the token are not the long-term stakers, but the people who are against the restoration of governance rewards.
I think, it is necessary to explain the situation on behalf of the developer.
This proposal was created to fix the only remaining fixable consequence of hack. It is clear that the return of tokens may entail a drop in the price of the token as a result of sales (I note that I’ll also suffer from this, since I receive a salary in TORN), however, the rewards are legitimate user funds received honestly, and it is my responsibility to offer to restore them.
However, it is worth noting that the beneficiaries of this proposal are the very old stakers who in total (at the time the voting began) had 392 252 staked TORN (proof, calculation code) but almost none of them voted. If, having a total of more than half of all possible votes, they wont be able to pass the proposal, simply because they don’t want to vote, this is exclusively their problem.
If the proposal will be defeated, then this will not change the already deployed code and contracts in any way, and if desired, any of these stakers will be able to propose it again.
1 Like
Has anyone checked the code?